>>> Updated Mon-Sat by 8 pm ETâ€
>>> and
>>>
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm#dashboard
>>>
>>> excess deaths since 2/1/2020 1,023,916
>>>
>>> And... the Christian Bible includes the statement that,
>>> "there are
>>> none so blind as those that refuse to see".
>>>
>>
>>
>> *OT item below, ignore if you wish*
>>
>> Regarding 'fact check' ( i.e. propaganda) services, here's
>> the HSS initial report including the actual US Government
>> press release document:
>>
>>
https://cnsnews.com/article/washington/michael-w-chapman/biden-hhs-fund-crack-pipe-distribution-part-30-million-harm
>>
>>
>> And here's the 'fact check'. Note: This is not from The
>> Onion, it's from their actual website 8 February 2022, but
>> has since been removed because even left wing politicians
>> screamed over the new policy proposal which was withdrawn:
>>
>> "In February 2022, right-leaning outlets reported
>> breathlessly that the Biden administration had plans to
>> fund the distribution of crack pipes in order to advance
>> the cause of racial equity...
>>
>> "Collectively, these articles gave readers a grossly
>> misleading and reductive presentation of what was a real
>> substance abuse harm reduction grant overseen by the Biden
>> administration in early 2022. We are issuing a rating of
>> 'Mostly False.'
>>
>> "It's true that the grant description required teh
>> provision of smoking kits - an established component of
>> harm reduction strategy - but in reality, those kits
>> constituted just one of several subcomponents of an even
>> longer list of requirements for grant recipients. In
>> other words, while outraged media coverage focused almost
>> exclusively on 'crack pipes', this was actually only a
>> very small part of the program.
>>
>> "Secondly, the provision of safer smoking supplies did not
>> have as its purpose advancing the cause of racial equity.
>> Rather its purpose was, quite logically, to reduce harm
>> and infection among existing drug users. However, the
>> grant description did state that priority would be given
>> to applicants who serve communities that are historically
>> underserved. In other words, the grant's terms
>> encouraged recipients to advance racial equity while
>> working for harm reduction, not the other way round - a
>> crucial distinction which many outlets got wrong."
>>
>> Self-beatified 'arbiters of truth' would be dangerous in a
>> free society if they were not so pathetically incompetent-
>> they can't make the lie seem believable any more. pfffft.
>>
>> I think a larger problem is that there are people inside
>> our government, bigots really, who wonder 'What can we
The HSS document was on that page:
https://cdn.cnsnews.com/styles/article_big/s3/2022-02/grant%20image%20.jpg
I am unfamiliar with CNS- don't know them. How about Yahoo
which was below it in a search:
https://news.yahoo.com/gop-outraged-30m-biden-plan-010656419.html
(for credibility, they spelled Sen. Marsha Blackburn's name
wrong..)
HSS walked that back the next morning under a PR disaster.
Here's Newsweek:
https://www.newsweek.com/why-biden-admin-handing-out-free-crack-pipes-1677439
I could barley follow the flipflops. From that page:
"Secretary Becerra clarified, "no federal funding will be
used directly or through subsequent reimbursement of
grantees to put pipes in safe smoking kits."
and:
"The 75-page application, which is still available to read
online, explains that eligible applicants for the grant
include state, local and tribal governments, as well as
tribal organizations and community-based organizations,
among others."
'still available' ?? took a while to find this at
hhs.gov
https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2021/12/08/samhsa-announces-unprecedented-30-million-harm-reduction-grant-funding-opportunity-help-address-nations-substance-use-overdose-epidemic.html
Lots about free syringes but no condoms or pipes or 'smoking
supplies'. Was it edited? Different grant? No idea.
More from Newsweek:
"One of the requirements for recipients of grant funding is
to purchase "equipment and supplies to enhance harm
reduction efforts." The application lists 20 examples.
These includes the "Safe smoking kits/supplies" that have
been the focus of some recent articles regarding crack
pipes. Other items on the list were infectious disease
testing kits, safe-sex kits, including PrEP resources and
condoms, syringes "to prevent and control the spread of
infectious diseases" and screening for infectious diseases.
The grant information does not mention pipes as part of safe
smoking kits or specify what those kits should contain. HHS
has now made clear that pipes will not be included."
Well, then. No crack pipes it seems. Oh! Next paragraph:
"However, pipes can sometimes be included in safe smoking
kits, according to the Associated Press (AP)."
Which is so much better because 'sometimes' is not 'always'.
Then again it isn't 'never' either. It's a wonder I
(taxpayer) can afford it.
carry on.